> Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: > > >The statement "It is not intended nor recommended as an encoding used > >for open information exchange." is underlined in the TR for emphasis. > The more important problem, from the point of view of the Unicode Consortium at this point, is that the "TR" is not yet an approved TR. It is a Draft Unicode Technical Report, available for public review, but not yet finally approved. I quote from the status section: "This is a draft document which may be updated, replaced, or superseded by other documents at any time. This is not a stable document; it is inappropriate to cite this document as other than a work in progress." So while it may be appropriate for Toby to start a registration on the basis of the current definition, I don't think it would be appropriate to actually approve and post a registration for "CESU-8" until the DUTR #26 is actually approved by the UTC and posted as a final UTR #26 -- at which point the document becomes stable and referenceable. --KenReceived on Wednesday, 2 January 2002 17:11:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 June 2006 15:10:52 GMT