W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: SourceForge Project Approved

From: Reitzel, Charlie <CReitzel@arrakisplanet.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 13:33:10 -0400
Message-ID: <B5C79DDBC655D311B6BD0008C7E64D76013C1547@exchange.arrakisplanet.com>
To: "'Randy Waki'" <rwaki@flipdog.com>
Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
+1.  As long as we maintain momentum on a library, I'm ok w/ an interim "bug
fix only" release.

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Waki [mailto:rwaki@flipdog.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:37 PM
To: Reitzel, Charlie; html-tidy@w3.org
Subject: RE: SourceForge Project Approved

Reitzel, Charlie wrote:
> Q: does that mean no separate lib to start?
> Besides the archives to thist list, I'm thinking we have some work ahead
> getting Terry Teague's Tidy bug pages and Dave R.'s "pending" stuff into
> Perfect Tracker (bug tracker on SF).
> Terry Teague's Tidy Bugs:
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs.html
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs2.html
> Tidy "Pending" items:
> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/pending.html

Hmm, good point.  The separate lib was one of the things that started
everyone down this path in the first place.  I'd hate to see enthusiasm
wane due to a "bug fix first" approach.

Perhaps a good middle ground might be to just apply previously posted
bug *fixes* (those that can be reasonably verified) while file names,
line numbers, etc. still match up.  Then go ahead with the refactoring
without necessarily pausing for a release.

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2001 13:33:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:38:50 UTC