RE: SourceForge Project Approved

Reitzel, Charlie wrote:
> 
> Q: does that mean no separate lib to start?
> 
> Besides the archives to thist list, I'm thinking we have some work ahead
> getting Terry Teague's Tidy bug pages and Dave R.'s "pending" stuff into
> Perfect Tracker (bug tracker on SF).
> 
> Terry Teague's Tidy Bugs:
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs.html
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/1057/tidybugs2.html
> 
> Tidy "Pending" items:
> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/pending.html

Hmm, good point.  The separate lib was one of the things that started
everyone down this path in the first place.  I'd hate to see enthusiasm
wane due to a "bug fix first" approach.

Perhaps a good middle ground might be to just apply previously posted
bug *fixes* (those that can be reasonably verified) while file names,
line numbers, etc. still match up.  Then go ahead with the refactoring
without necessarily pausing for a release.

Randy

Received on Monday, 21 May 2001 22:37:56 UTC