W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: strike, s, u tags OK in strict DTD?

From: Zac Thompson <zthompso@mks.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 13:32:42 -0400
Message-ID: <37E912BA.F2C2B813@mks.com>
To: html-tidy@w3.org

This bug is still in the July 26th version, for those interested.
I'd like to be able to use tidy to be sure the pages are valid,
not just "tidy", so this is a bigger deal for me than for most.
But keep up the great work, Dave!  It's still the best tool I've
got for this stuff, so I won't complain.

Zac

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Baslock" <cbaslock@kansas.net>
To: "Zac Thompson" <zthompso@mks.com>, <html-tidy@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:41:56 -0500
Subject: Re: strike, s, u tags OK in strict DTD?

Ok in "Transitional"
Unrecognized in "Strict"

Per
http://validator.w3.org

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Zac Thompson <zthompso@mks.com>
To: <html-tidy@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 13:14
Subject: strike, s, u tags OK in strict DTD?

> <strike></strike>
> <s></s>
> <u></u>
> 
> I don't think these are valid except with the Transitional ("Loose") 
> DTD.  Am I missing something, or is this a known issue?  A lot of 
> the files I'm working with contain the <u> tag right now.

-- 
Zac Thompson           [mailto:zthompson@mks.com]
Mortice Kern Systems Inc.    [http://www.mks.com]
185 Columbia St. W. Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 5Z5
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 1999 13:30:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:42 GMT