W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > July to September 1999

strike, s, u tags OK in strict DTD?

From: Zac Thompson <zthompso@mks.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:14:18 -0400
Message-ID: <378CD37A.90B95195@mks.com>
To: html-tidy@w3.org


I don't think these are valid except with the Transitional ("Loose") 
DTD.  Am I missing something, or is this a known issue?  A lot of 
the files I'm working with contain the <u> tag right now.

[C:/Temp/html] tidy strike.htm

Tidy (vers 7th July 1999) Parsing "strike.htm"

"strike.htm" appears to be HTML 4.0
no warnings or errors were found

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN">
<title>testing ability to catch strike, s, u</title>
<p><strike>This is one way</strike></p>

<p><s>Here's another way to do it</s></p>

<p><u>This should be underlined</u></p>



Zac Thompson           [mailto:zthompson@mks.com]
Mortice Kern Systems Inc.    [http://www.mks.com]
185 Columbia St. W. Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 5Z5
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 1999 14:10:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:38:46 UTC