Re: Privacy Review - Decentralized Identifier Specification v1.0

Hi Brent,

Yes, we have a reviewer looking at the spec now, and will be sharing their findings at the next PING meeting (Jan 21).  They’ll either file any issues that come up before hand or immediately after (deepening on the reviewers findings, confidence and PING discussion).

Hope that helps!
Pete

> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:39 AM, Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@evernym.com> wrote:
> 
> Just following up on this. Do you know if a reviewer has been assigned?
> 
> We are hoping to transition to CR in early February and would like as much time as possible to get PING feedback incorporated into our spec.
> 
> Grateful for your work and for PING's efforts to support privacy on the web, and looking forward to seeing feedback.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Brent
> 
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020, 08:38 Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote:
> Thank you Brent.
> 
> We have a PING call today, so I have added this request to the agenda.
> 
> Thank you also for the offer to join a DID WG weekly teleconference. We will keep this in mind.
> 
> Christine
> 
> > On Dec 16, 2020, at 11:29 AM, Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@evernym.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Greetings PING,
> > 
> > The DID WG is requesting horizontal review of the Decentralized Identifier Specification v1.0
> > 
> > We have also completed the Security and Privacy Questionnaire
> > 
> > We look forward to receiving feedback from you and invite you to open issues in our Github repository for that feedback.
> > 
> > We also welcome PING members to join one of the DID WG weekly teleconferences. Please contact the DID WG chairs if you would like to arrange this.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> > Brent Zundel, co-Chair DID WG
>

Received on Thursday, 7 January 2021 01:23:53 UTC