- From: pwin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 08:03:14 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
sorry, last answer got cut short.... the discussion on versioning then brought us onto workflow. That's a bit like 'status' but it is slightly different. I wonder if we need to separate them in some way? E.g. I can have a draft that is in preparation, or a draft that is completed. So perhaps there needs to be some property, say 'workflowStage' that takes as its object a concept or category On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 08:52, tombaker <notifications@github.com> wrote: > @dr-shorthair - Thank you for filling in the background! > > I'm developing a profile of DCAT for the Queensland Government right now, > for example, a lot of which is rules around the use of DC properties. But > 'status' comes up all the time, and I'm always somewhat surprised to find > it missing from the 'standard' RDF vocabs. > > Another group developing an application profile recently flagged 'status' > as a gap and argued for including it in DCMI Metadata Terms. We have been > conservative about adding terms but the vocabulary is not frozen, hence my > question whether other general-purpose properties have emerged in the DCAT > context as gaps. > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1238#issuecomment-634492776>, or > unsubscribe > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIFYTHWRS5UEWYKGKA4D53RTTBFBANCNFSM4M6CM3XQ > > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by pwin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1238#issuecomment-634495346 using your GitHub account On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 08:52, tombaker <notifications@github.com> wrote: > @dr-shorthair - Thank you for filling in the background! > > I'm developing a profile of DCAT for the Queensland Government right now, > for example, a lot of which is rules around the use of DC properties. But > 'status' comes up all the time, and I'm always somewhat surprised to find > it missing from the 'standard' RDF vocabs. > > Another group developing an application profile recently flagged 'status' > as a gap and argued for including it in DCMI Metadata Terms. We have been > conservative about adding terms but the vocabulary is not frozen, hence my > question whether other general-purpose properties have emerged in the DCAT > context as gaps. > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1238#issuecomment-634492776>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIFYTHWRS5UEWYKGKA4D53RTTBFBANCNFSM4M6CM3XQ> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by pwin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1238#issuecomment-634498186 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2020 08:04:34 UTC