- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:48:36 +0000
- To: xsl-editors@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6269 Summary: [XSLFO] ipd/bpd percentage base Product: XSLFO Version: 1.1 Platform: All URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl- editors/2007AprJun/0004 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSL-FO AssignedTo: alb.w3c@gmail.com ReportedBy: Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com QAContact: xsl-editors@w3.org I am seeking clarification of the XSL-FO 1.1 Recommendation at Sections 7.15.3 (block-progression-dimension) and 7.15.7 (inline-progression-dimension), for the <percentage> calculation. In both cases, the percentage base is described as "the corresponding dimension of the closest area ancestor that was generated by a block-level formatting object."[1] This definition does not address formatting objects that may be direct descendants of the fo:flow, such as fo:block-container and fo:table, that can specify ipd and bpd. My intuition wants to restate the definition as follows: "the corresponding dimension of the closest area ancestor that is either a reference area or an area that was generated by a block-level formatting object." Can you either confirm that this restatement is correct, or provide additional guidance for the case I have described? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2008 14:48:46 UTC