xsl-editors@w3.org from January to March 2004 by date

Wednesday, 31 March 2004

• WARNING: Potential virus sent by you! Alert.Notification@ivisgroup.com

Tuesday, 30 March 2004

• Impact of CSS 2.1? Chris Lilley

Friday, 26 March 2004

• Extreme Markup Languages Conference 2004 Steve Newcomb

Monday, 22 March 2004

• Comments on XSL extensions Paul Grosso

Friday, 19 March 2004

• Butterfly XML IDE based on new Real-time Incremental Parsing Algorithm Jules White

Thursday, 18 March 2004

• EditiX v1.2.1 tec

Tuesday, 16 March 2004

• Re: Welcome to Motorola Site Adfunk Worldwide 3 Melissa Underwood

Monday, 15 March 2004

• RE: The Formatting Object Section Robertson, Andy

Friday, 12 March 2004

• Re: The Formatting Object Section Paul Grosso

Sunday, 7 March 2004

• David Duke is a malignant narcissist. Great Geragos

Friday, 5 March 2004

• RE: The Formatting Object Section Klaas_Bals@inventivedesigners.com
• RE: The Formatting Object Section Robertson, Andy
• Re: The Formatting Object Section Klaas_Bals@inventivedesigners.com

Thursday, 4 March 2004

• The Formatting Object Section Robertson, Andy

Tuesday, 2 March 2004

• condition for penultimate page Edrees Wazeer
• Typo in note of 6.4.11 Oliver Becker

Monday, 1 March 2004

• :) szilles@adobe.com

Friday, 27 February 2004

• congratulation interlottery@iname.com

Wednesday, 25 February 2004

• Chapter 4 comments of 1.1 spec Glen Mazza

Saturday, 21 February 2004

• page-viewport-area content-rectangle Peter B. West

Thursday, 19 February 2004

• Out of Office AutoReply: stolen Alexander Falk

Sunday, 8 February 2004

• Interaction between force-page-count and initial-page-number Peter B. West

Wednesday, 4 February 2004

• FW_Employees Revenge bumblebee@myrealbox.com

Wednesday, 28 January 2004

• RE: [historical question] Has the property "order-by" ever been supported by W3C XSL(T) ? Jim Fuller
• RE: [historical question] Has the property "order-by" ever been supported by W3C XSL(T) ? Kay, Michael
• Re: [historical question] Has the property "order-by" ever been supported by W3C XSL(T) ? Oleg Tkachenko
• [historical question] Has the property "order-by" ever been supported by W3C XSL(T) ? Collin

Tuesday, 27 January 2004

• You Are Invited! Will Smith

Sunday, 25 January 2004

• Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport! Will Smith

Saturday, 24 January 2004

• Re: XSL 1.1 WD comment: The properties which may be attached to an F O. Paul Grosso

Monday, 19 January 2004

• Hi jjc@jclark.com
• Comments on Ch. 1 of XSL 1.1 WD Glen Mazza
• Hi jjc@jclark.com
• Hi jjc@jclark.com
• Hi jjc@jclark.com
• Hi jjc@jclark.com
• Hi jjc@jclark.com

Sunday, 18 January 2004

• RE: XSLT 2.0 and <script> Jim Fuller

Saturday, 17 January 2004

• XSLT 2.0 and <script> Yusuf Simonson
• Comments on XSL1.0 komachi@y-adagio.com
• Re: XSL 1.1 WD fo:retrieve-table-marker Peter B. West
• XSL 1.1 WD fo:retrieve-table-marker Peter B. West

Friday, 16 January 2004

• RE: XSL 1.1 WD comment: The properties which may be attached to an FO. Glen Mazza
• Re: XSL 1.1 WD comment: The properties which may be attached to an F O. Peter B. West
• Re: XSL 1.1 WD comment: The properties which may be attached to an F O. Paul Grosso

Thursday, 15 January 2004

• Re: XSL 1.1 WD comment: The properties which may be attached to an F O. Peter B. West
• Re: XSL 1.1 WD comment: The properties which may be attached to an F O. Paul Grosso
• XSL 1.1 WD comment: The properties which may be attached to an F O. Mazza, Glen R., ,CPMS

Monday, 12 January 2004

• Re: Do you have a time share? Marty Braun

Wednesday, 8 January 2003

• 911 Probe: Public Signatures Sought Eric A. Smith

Friday, 2 January 2004

• CFP: IEEE/WIC/ACM Web Intelligence 2004 WI/IAT Conference Secretariat

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 22:58:05 UTC