Regarding your comment about basic-link missing from %block; on xsl-editors from Paul Grosso on 2002-12-04 (xsl-editors@w3.org from October to December 2002)

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:56:09 -0600
To: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com>
Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20021204165209.024d1f00@172.27.10.30>

Eliot,

Thank you for your comment to xsl-editors@w3.org archived at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2002OctDec/0029


The following is our disposition of your above comment:

---

Disposition: Explanation of XSL spec

fo:basic-link generates one or more normal inline-areas (see 6.9.2). 
It should thus not be part of the list of FOs in %block; that lists 
those that generate block-areas. To use fo:basic-link as a block-level 
object it needs to be wrapped in an fo:block - (see note in 6.9.2).

---

Please Reply (cc-ing xsl-editors@w3.org) if you wish to make
an objection to our resolution.

Thank you for your interest in XSL.

Paul Grosso for the XSL FO Subgroup of the XSL WG

Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 18:04:35 UTC