- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:44:29 -0500
- To: xsl-editors@w3.org
I notice that xsl:message is still defined to produce an XML fragment as it was in XSLT 1.0. This term is also used in section 16.1.3 where the spec states, "An extension function <http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#dt-extension-function> can be used to convert the argument to a string or return an XML fragment to be copied to the result tree if desired." However, nowhere does the 1.0 or 2.0 spec actually define the term "XML fragment". I suspect it would be possible to write these two sections purely in terms of sequences, without reference to some nebulous concept of "XML fragment". However, if it isn't possible, then the spec needs to state precisely what it means by the words "XML fragment". -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (IDG Books, 2001) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 16:40:08 UTC