- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:39:15 GMT
- To: distobj@acm.org
- CC: xsl-editors@w3.org
> Right. XHTML doesn't support (except to ignore) non-XHTML namespaces > within its documents, so a compound media type is required in all cases. Hmm. In practice given a document with lots of namespaces I think trying to think of suitable mime types is a lost cause. text/xml or application/xml would seem to be the best that can be done here. If you are really saying that if in a collection of xhtml files some just happen to have mathml or svg illustratons then I have to configure the server to send those documents with a different mime type then I don't think that will ever work in practice. Distributing such documents on the web should never need server configuration, you should be able to just get a dialup ISP account and dump some files in a directory. If they have .xhtml extensions and all get sent as text/xml+html, then so be it, the browser will have to sort it out when it gets to the namespaced elements. (Mozilla will do this natively for mathml and SVG, as will netscape and IE if the main xhtml file references a stylesheet that traps the mathml namespaced elements and does whatever is necessary to render those languages on the client). David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Monday, 21 January 2002 09:39:55 UTC