- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:43:06 +0100
- To: "'Kevin O'Riordan'" <koriordan99@hotmail.com>, xsl-editors@w3.org
- Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E6210622B8D7@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
Thanks for the comment. I agree that it's a little inelegant. Unfortunately it isn't really feasible to use an attribute because there can be multiple sort keys. Nor is it really feasible to change the current syntax, which is now well-established, even if we could come up with something that's obviously better. You do have the option with XSLT 2.0 to write a top-level sort key specification, using <xsl:sort-key>, and then to reference it in the select expression: <xsl:for-each select="sort('sort-key-1', catalog/cd)"> ... </xsl:for-each> Thanks for the comment. Mike Kay -----Original Message----- From: Kevin O'Riordan [mailto:koriordan99@hotmail.com] Sent: 09 January 2002 12:39 To: xsl-editors@w3.org Subject: XSL sort Hi I haven't looked in any great detail at the new spec so my apologies of these comments are irrelevant: Consider the following snippet from an xsl file taken from the w3c schools tutorial: <xsl:for-each select="catalog/cd"> <xsl:sort select="artist"/> <tr> <td><xsl:value-of select="title"/></td> <td><xsl:value-of select="artist"/></td> </tr> </xsl:for-each> Apart from the nested sort, the xsl nexted within the 'for each' block acts on each specific 'cd' element found in the xml file to be transformed. In my view, it is unintuitive and confusing to have the 'sort' instruction at this level when it really pertains to the whole iteration. I think a syntax like this makes more intuitive sense. <xsl:for-each select="catalog/cd" sort="artist"> <tr> <td><xsl:value-of select="title"/></td> <td><xsl:value-of select="artist"/></td> </tr> </xsl:for-each> Regards Kevin O'Riordan
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 10:43:22 UTC