RE: xslt 2 working draft

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DPawson@rnib.org.uk [mailto:DPawson@rnib.org.uk]
> Sent: 03 January 2002 08:22
> To: xsl-editors@w3.org
> Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org
> Subject: xslt 2 working draft
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#section-Summary-of-Issues
> Issue 1: binding-to-schema
> 
> Description: Do we need to say anything, or add any capabilities, for
> binding a stylesheet to a schema? Presumably the names of 
> types used in
> variable declarations must be known statically, which implies 
> that a schema
> is available statically.
> 
> >From http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlgl#g4_0
> 
> 
> 4.2 Provide a machine-understandable means/mechanism to get 
> from a document
> instance to the schema. 
> 
> I think an XSLT stylesheet stands as an XML document?
>
Yes, but that's not what this issue is talking about. Your reference is
talking about getting from an XML document to its own schema. This issue is
talking about whether a stylesheet should declare the class (or classes) of
source document that it is designed to process.

Mike Kay

Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 11:04:31 UTC