- From: Diamond, Jason <Jason.Diamond@MKG.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:46:36 -0500 (EST)
- To: "'xsl-editors@w3.org'" <xsl-editors@w3.org>
How about [xsl:]default-element-namespace and [xsl:]default-attribute-namespace? The first makes it explicitly obvious that the default namespace only applies to element axes. Adding the second would make it easier to work with (revised) RDF and XLink where the attributes are required to be qualified. Either way, would it be more appropriate to use [xsl:]default-xpath-prefix, [xsl:]default-element-prefix or [xsl:]default-attribute-prefix since we more than likely would have to include a namespace declaration for the namespace(s) in question anyways? It would be nice if we could avoid the duplicated namespace name that's found in just about every XML Schema with a targetNamespace attribute. Plus, this is already the approach a number of other XSLT attributes take. For completeness, what about [xsl:]default-function-namespace or [xsl:]default-function-prefix? Jason Diamond.
Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2001 12:50:21 UTC