- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:11:50 -0400
- To: <w3c-ac-forum@w3.org>, <xsl-editors@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-archive@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010925105226.01eb0cf0@mail.webnw.com>
================================================================ REVIEW FORM BEGINS I, W3C Advisory Committee Representative: #1 Given Name: Murray #2 Family Name: Maloney #3 Email Address: murray@muzmo.com as representative for #4 W3C Member: Commerce One review the "XSL 1.0" Proposed Recommendation: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/PR-xsl-20010828/ as follows: ----------------- 1) As representative of the above company, I suggest that XSL 1.0: #1A [X ] be published as a W3C Recommendation as is or with insubstantial changes suggested by others 2) My organization (mark only one with X): #2B [X ] expects to produce products conforming to XSL 1.0 Recomendation 3) Intellectual Property Rights (mark one only with X): #3A [X] To the best of my knowledge, my organization does not have patents which form essential technology for implementing the "XSL 1.0" specification. 4) Detailed Comments, Reasons, or Modifications: The web community has been awaiting an industrial strength style language for too long. XSL 1.0 has been quite thoroughly and rigorously tested and found to be highly useful for a variety of purposes and modalities. I encourage my fellow AC members to vote in favor of its adoption as a W3C Recommendation without delay. 5) Expected implementation schedules: No comments 6) Disclosure of Review response: #6A [X] My organization is willing to share its review with W3C Membership. REVIEW FORM ENDS
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 11:14:02 UTC