- From: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@nadita.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 03:10:43 -0400 (EDT)
- To: xsl-editors@w3.org
Antenna House XSL Formatter V1.1 [1] supports the collapsing border model, which I have implemented. But I could not agree to the XSL CR section 6.7.10, "It is an error if there are two such borders that have the same precedence but are not identitical." Instead, the CSS2 border conflict resolution rule [2] was adopted for borders with same precedence specified. In addition, I thought that border-style "none" always should have lowest precedence, and "hidden" always should have highest precedence. I believe that the former is quite right, but I am not so confident of the latter. border-style "none" with higher border-precedence specified value should not have higher precedence since table-cell borders (default precedence is "0" on fo:table-cell) should not be hidden by table's "none" borders (default precedence is "1" on fo:table). border-style "hidden" should have higher precedence than other borders (with same border-precedence specified value). IMHO in most cases the CSS2 border conflict resolution rule is more useful than the border-precedence specification. Dear XSL authors, please reconsider this problem. [1] http://www.antennahouse.com/xslformatter.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/tables.html#border-conflict-resolution Shinyu Murakami Antenna House XSL Formatter team
Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 06:58:24 UTC