- From: Anders Berglund <alrb@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:02:42 -0400
- To: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@nadita.com>
- Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org
I'm afraid that expressions do come with a price in that there are some ambiguities where you cannot take a shortcut and leave out specification. Thus if you want the value to include the "(" then you will have to enclose the value in quotes to make the value a literal. The working group considered various options, including: - not permitting expressions for certain properties where it is more common to have a literal value rather than an expression (extremely difficult to remember which ones permit expressions) - some special syntax - like starting with a "!" to indicate "don't evaluate as an expression" (special case saving only one keystroke so not really worth it) - parsing the value as a string first and then if the value is not valid evaluate it as an expression (in many cases the first test is ambiguous) - adding e.g. eval() around all expressions (rather cumbersome) and decided that requiring quotes in some cases was the best trade-off. >Dear xsl-editors, > >The XSL WD 2000-03-27 says: > > 5.8 Expressions > All property value specifications in attributes within an > XSL stylesheet can be expressions. > >How to distinguish expressions from immediate (non-expression) values? > >The expressions and the immediate values are syntactically different, >but there are ambiguous points. > >In the expression syntax, the string values are quoted with single >or double-quotes. e.g., the "format" property may be specified: >format="'(1)'" (the outer "" are XML attribute syntax's and inner '' >are XSL expression syntax's). > >We can also specify: format="(1)" as immediate value ("" are XML >syntax's, not XSL expression's). Here, the parentheses are part >of string value (number-formatting: (1) (2) (3) ...), >but if this is expression, the parentheses are syntax's >parentheses and the value is 1 (number-formatting: 1 2 3 ...) >It's very ambiguous. How to resolve it? > >Thanks, >MURAKAMI Shinyu
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2001 12:03:16 UTC