- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 17:18:35 +0900
- To: Karen Lease <klease@club-internet.fr>, xsl-editors@w3.org
- Cc: fop-dev@xml.apache.org
At 18:18 01/02/15 -0500, Karen Lease wrote: >Hello again, > >I suppose this has been mentioned before, but it still bothers me to be >able to specify xxx="inherit" when xxx isn't inheritable. Please change 'inheritable' to 'inherited', and everything looks much more reasonable (I'm not sure where you got the word 'inheritable' from, I hope it's not in the spec itself.) Either a property is (by default) inherited, or it can be inherited by specifying 'inherit' as a property value. Regards, Martin. >(Of course, if >it is inheritable, there's no reason to say so, since if xxx isn't >specified, it will get the value from its parent.) > >The meaning seems to be identical to xxx="from-parent(xxx)", including >the case of shorthand properties. > >So is this just to simplify life for users? > >Karen Lease (FOP contributor)
Received on Sunday, 18 February 2001 04:37:38 UTC