- From: Peter B. West <pbwest@powerup.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:12:06 -0500 (EST)
- To: xsl-editors@w3.org
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Block-stacking constraint example in 4.2.5 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:57:18 +1000 From: "Peter B. West" <pbwest@powerup.com.au> Reply-To: pbwest@powerup.com.au Organization: Dis To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org References: <3A681DEA.18886.840F8E@localhost><3A6A8DBD.CF39F0F2@powerup.com.au> <3.0.6.32.20010121144340.007ff600@chebucto.ns.ca> The tree node diagram at the beginning of the above example (mantree.gif), I personally would prefer to see replaced by nested block diagrams as are used (block-stacking-constraints.gif) to illustrate the concept of block-stacking constraints. I.e., block diagrams including the stacking constraints, and also the fence-after B which eliminates the D-E constraint. Peter -- Peter B. West pbwest@powerup.com.au http://powerup.com.au/~pbwest "Lord, to whom shall we go?"
Received on Friday, 26 January 2001 05:51:31 UTC