- From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:34:06 +0100
- To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
- Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org
Wanting to clarify the reference to a stylesheet from a document instance, I received this from the Max. Looks like the M$ adopted way of saying the stylesheet is XSLT will be changed to align with the RFC. so now it should be <?xml-stylesheet type="application/xslt+xml" href="style/page.xsl"?> Should this be formalised in 2.0? Regards DaveP -----Original Message----- From: Max Froumentin [mailto:mf@w3.org] Sent: 24 April 2001 05:24 To: DPawson@rnib.org.uk Subject: Re: link to XSLT stylesheet DPawson@rnib.org.uk writes: > On the list, Mike Brown pointed out that the ?mime type? > may not be right, using the M$ text/xsl, > do you have any further information on that? > Could it / should it be added to the document? (Sorry, I don't have much time to follow the list) You're right, there is no text/xsl mime type, although there is a text/css (RFC2318 [1]). BUT, there is "application/xslt+xml", recently defined by RFC 3023 [2], dated January 2001. So I guess it's that one Microsoft and others should use. But I reckon it'll take time for vendors to use it (ask David C about text/mathml+xml, defined in the same RFC). Cheers, Max. [1] ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2318.txt [2] ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3023.txt
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2001 03:50:22 UTC