- From: Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 11:01:19 +0000
- To: xsl-editors@w3.org
The use of the master-name property within fo:simple-page-master , fo:page-sequence-master and fo:page-sequence I find very confusing. Within fo:single-page-master-reference you specify master-name, but element indicates its a reference, not a 'name' or identifier. For the previous 3 elements, I'm not sure if each is a reference or an identifier. I would find it far more helpful if the property were changed to clearly indicate to users that the first two are idenfiers, and in the third case its a reference, perhaps by changing the property name to master-name-reference. If this is done, the practice could be made common by renaming the master-name property in the sub-sequence elements of page-sequence-master. E.g. <fo:page-sequence-master master-name="master-sequence"> <fo:single-page-master-reference master-name-reference="first"/> <fo:repeatable-page-master-reference master-name-reference="red" maximum-repeats="10"/> <fo:repeatable-page-master-reference master-name-reference="green" maximum-repeats="no-limit"/> </fo:page-sequence-master> Then fo:page-sequence would read <fo:page-sequence master-page-reference="master-sequence" Its difficult enough to understand without adding to the complexity by misleading readers with poorly named properties. Regards DaveP AC, RNIB.
Received on Saturday, 23 December 2000 06:02:48 UTC