- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@macfaq.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:34:53 -0500
- To: xsl-editors@w3.org
The phrase "XML Fragment" is still used in section 13, Messages, of the XSLT 1.1 spec, as well as now in section 14.3. However, it still isn;t defined. It's a little clearer from this draft that what's meant is a string form of some XML markup and text, probabaly not necessarily a well-formed XML document. However, this term still needs to be defined more precisely before it's used. For instance, am I correct or not in assuming that root element is not necessary for a fragment of this nature? -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible (IDG Books, 1999) | | http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/books/bible/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764532367/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2000 09:36:31 UTC