- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:29:08 +0700
- To: TOM <ptittom@free.fr>
- CC: xsl-editors@w3.org
TOM wrote: > > Le 21/11/00 05:30:00, James Clark a écrit : > > xsl:variable is in the category "instruction", but xsl:param is not. > > Thus xsl:for-each can have xsl:variable children but not xsl:param > > children. > > Oh sorry, I wasn't clear. > > > > the Rec isn't very clear about what is a "template". > > > In 11.5 : > > > "It is an erreor if a binding established by an xsl:variable or > > > xsl:param element within a template shadows another binding > > > established by an xsl:variable or xsl:param also within the > > > template. It is not an erreor if a binding established by an > > > xsl:variable or xsl:param element in a template shadows another > > > binding established by an xsl:variable or xsl:param top-level > > > element." > > Here only 2 "levels" are described : 2 variables or parameters within the > same template, 2 variables or parameters at different places : one in a > template, the other at top-level. > Though what's called a template exactly ? Do the word "template" here only > refer to xsl:template ? I think I see where the problem is now. You are correct in saying that there are two levels: (1) at the top-level (2) anywhere else where the syntax summary allows it. (2) is called "in a template". Level (2) variables can shadow level (1) variables, but no level (2) variable can shadow any other level (2) variable. There's a bug in the text. In "It is an erreor if a binding established by an xsl:variable or xsl:param element within a template shadows another binding established by an xsl:variable or xsl:param also within ***the*** template." The highlighted "the" should be "a". Does this make things clear? James
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2000 01:31:06 UTC