[Fwd: CR WD - 4.6.1 Stacking Condition 3]

--
Regards,
 -- JeffC

******************************************************
Dr. Jeffrey L. Caruso <jcaruso@pageflexinc.com>
Pageflex, Inc.  215 First St.  Cambridge, MA 02142
(A Bitstream company)

Forwarded message 1

  • From: Jeff Caruso <jcaruso@bitstream.com>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:03:42 -0500
  • Subject: Re: CR WD - 4.6.1 Stacking Condition 3
  • To: Glenn Adams <gadams@vgi.com>
  • Message-ID: <3A0FF4BE.79344A81@bitstream.com>
Glenn Adams wrote:

> 4.6.1, stacking condition (3) has "the alignment-point of I equals the offset".
> Is alignment-point a vector or a scalar? If the former (as "point" implies)
> holds, then it clearly can't equal an offset (which is clearly a scalar).
> Something is missing here.

Read the whole sentence:

For any inline-area descendant I of P ,

the distance in the shift-direction from the dominant baseline of P to the
alignment-point of I

equals

the offset between the dominant baseline of P and the baseline of P corresponding
to the alignment-baseline trait of I ,

plus

the sum of the baseline-shifts for I and all of its ancestors which are descendants
of P .


Regards,
 -- JeffC

******************************************************
Dr. Jeffrey L. Caruso <jcaruso@pageflexinc.com>
Pageflex, Inc.  215 First St.  Cambridge, MA 02142
(A Bitstream company)

Received on Monday, 13 November 2000 09:12:50 UTC