--
Regards,
-- JeffC
******************************************************
Dr. Jeffrey L. Caruso <jcaruso@pageflexinc.com>
Pageflex, Inc. 215 First St. Cambridge, MA 02142
(A Bitstream company)
Forwarded message 1
Glenn Adams wrote:
> 4.6.1, stacking condition (3) has "the alignment-point of I equals the offset".
> Is alignment-point a vector or a scalar? If the former (as "point" implies)
> holds, then it clearly can't equal an offset (which is clearly a scalar).
> Something is missing here.
Read the whole sentence:
For any inline-area descendant I of P ,
the distance in the shift-direction from the dominant baseline of P to the
alignment-point of I
equals
the offset between the dominant baseline of P and the baseline of P corresponding
to the alignment-baseline trait of I ,
plus
the sum of the baseline-shifts for I and all of its ancestors which are descendants
of P .
Regards,
-- JeffC
******************************************************
Dr. Jeffrey L. Caruso <jcaruso@pageflexinc.com>
Pageflex, Inc. 215 First St. Cambridge, MA 02142
(A Bitstream company)