- From: Nikolai Grigoriev <grig@renderx.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 23:20:04 +0300
- To: <xsl-editors@w3.org>
Dear XSL editors, I am puzzled with the definition of the shift-direction. In [7.35.7 "writing-mode"], the shift-direction for lr-tb writing-mode is defined as bottom-to-top. In [7.11.1 "alignment-adjust], the following mapping of the <length> value to the baseline offset is established: "The offset is opposite to the shift-direction if that value is positive and in the shift-direction if that value is negative." It means that, for normal Latin text, positive values of "alignment-adjust" shift the baseline down, and negative values shift it up. In [7.37.22 "vertical-align"], <length> values for the vertical-align shorthand are mapped directly to the "alignment-adjust" property; so one could deduce that the negative value should raise the text, and the positive value should lower it. However, in the citation from CSS2, the baseline shift direction is said to be the opposite: "<length> - Raise (positive value) or lower (negative value) the box by this distance." I feel there's some inconsistency here. Isn't it strange that positive values of alignment-adjust move the text down? This breaks the "least astonishment" principle and contradicts CSS2 usage. Wouldn't it be more natural to define alignment-adjust and similar properties as mere offsets _in the same direction_ as the shift-direction axis? The semantics of the axis name would then become more straightforward. Best regards, Nikolai Grigoriev RenderX, Inc.
Received on Saturday, 26 August 2000 16:17:37 UTC