- From: Michael Fuller <msf@mds.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:12:53 +1000
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 01:45:56PM +0100, David Carlisle wrote: > > But in the latter alternative, the namespace > > nodes associated with the element 'foo' are: > The order is machine specific in eithercase. I now understand; David Marston was kind enough to point out that XPath Sec. 5 explicitly states that the relative order of namespace and attributes nodes is implementation-dependent; I'd missed that paragraph on my hunts through XSLT & XPath. Thanks for your time. Michael
Received on Thursday, 29 June 2000 21:13:19 UTC