- From: Sheila Thomson <discuss@bluegumtree.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 16:51:19 +0100
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <D986FDAD-4C28-48BF-A84F-BA1ACF7F8E96@bluegumtree.com>
Gerritt, you are a star! This is perfect, thank you. Sheila On 15 July 2025 07:00:12 BST, "Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex" <gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de> wrote: >Hi Sheila, > >There’s p:system-property(), https://spec.xproc.org/3.1/xproc/#f.system-property > >Gerrit > >On 15.07.2025 05:33, Sheila Thomson wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to get better at adding provenance metadata to outputs, such as an identifier for each of the source documents (prov:wasDerivedFrom), the name of the pipeline (prov:plan) and when the process was run. I'd like to also record the name of the XProc processor that was used (prov:SoftwareAgent) but I can't find a step or function that makes that information available within a pipeline. I thought that p:os-info might (even though it's not really OS information) even if an implementer chose to include that in the result of p:os-info, the spec doesn't specify a uniform name for that property. I checked the XPath 3.1 functions as well and don't see anything there that might provide it either. >> >> Has this been (officially) discussed before? I haven't found anything in the archives but that doesn't mean it's not there :) If so, I'd be grateful if someone could help me find the thread(s) so I can catch-up. If not, I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on this. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Sheila Thomson >> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2025 15:51:40 UTC