- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:54:50 +0000
- To: Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>
- Cc: denis.maier@unibe.ch, xproc-dev@w3.org
Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net> writes: > On the one hand I can see that this would be a convenient feature in xproc spec, or an implementation extension. On the other hand it is feature creep for something that xproc writers can do themselves. As a general principle, I agree. But calling out to p:exec isn’t very portable and in this case the processor already has to be able to do base64 encoding and decoding. I think it’s worth trying to make this easier. Be seeing you, norm -- Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/ > Art is not a mirror held up to reality but a hammer with which to shape > it.--Bertold Brecht
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2025 14:54:59 UTC