Re: Java 17?

• From: Martin Honnen <martin.honnen@gmx.de>
• Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 19:03:45 +0100
• To: xproc-dev@w3.org
• Message-ID: <bf3d1c40-1739-4496-b82a-c594043b133b@gmx.de>

On 06/12/2025 13:30, Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote:
> I observe that there are already extension steps that require Java 17 (the Polyglot and RDF steps)


I can understand the move to Java 17 and have no objections. I thought, 
however, that the Polyglot stuff is dependent on using GraalVM 21, and 
not Java 17.

Received on Sunday, 7 December 2025 18:03:51 UTC