- From: Piez, Wendell A. (Fed) <wendell.piez@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:19:03 +0000
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Norm,
Ah, this is nice - not as complicated as I had feared, and rational (as those are both compound steps). Thanks!
Cheers, Wendell
-----Original Message-----
From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 9:50 AM
To: Piez, Wendell A. (Fed) <wendell.piez@nist.gov>
Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Subject: Re: with-input name="source"
> Could I have an example of a step where it’s different?
I think the answer is on p:viewport and p:for-each.
> Is there a way I can tell in the spec?
Yes, but perhaps its a little indirect. In the description of both those steps, you’ll find that they have “a single anonymous input”.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/
> Where it is permissible both to die and not to die, it is an abuse of
> valour to die.--Mencius
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2024 15:19:09 UTC