- From: Piez, Wendell A. (Fed) <wendell.piez@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:19:03 +0000
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Norm, Ah, this is nice - not as complicated as I had feared, and rational (as those are both compound steps). Thanks! Cheers, Wendell -----Original Message----- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 9:50 AM To: Piez, Wendell A. (Fed) <wendell.piez@nist.gov> Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org> Subject: Re: with-input name="source" > Could I have an example of a step where it’s different? I think the answer is on p:viewport and p:for-each. > Is there a way I can tell in the spec? Yes, but perhaps its a little indirect. In the description of both those steps, you’ll find that they have “a single anonymous input”. Be seeing you, norm -- Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/ > Where it is permissible both to die and not to die, it is an abuse of > valour to die.--Mencius
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2024 15:19:09 UTC