- From: Piez, Wendell A. (Fed) <wendell.piez@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 16:38:07 +0000
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Norm, That would be awesome. Of course it also means I might need two Schematrons. ('Schematra'?) One for Any XProc and one for my House Rules. But that's a Schematron feature, not a problem. Cheers, Wendell -----Original Message----- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 12:15 PM To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org> Subject: Re: Extract XML from docx file with xproc 3.0 p:unarchive > You make an excellent point about running Schematron over the XProc. I am doing the same in my project at https://github.com/usnistgov/oscal-xproc3 - saving me many, many hours debugging. I like that. I shall have to see about adding a flag to my implementation that supports doing that as part of the compile process. Be seeing you, norm -- Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/ > There is no safety in numbers, or in anything else.--James Thurber
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2024 16:38:17 UTC