- From: Piez, Wendell A. (Fed) <wendell.piez@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 16:38:07 +0000
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Norm,
That would be awesome.
Of course it also means I might need two Schematrons. ('Schematra'?) One for Any XProc and one for my House Rules.
But that's a Schematron feature, not a problem.
Cheers, Wendell
-----Original Message-----
From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 12:15 PM
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Extract XML from docx file with xproc 3.0 p:unarchive
> You make an excellent point about running Schematron over the XProc. I am doing the same in my project at https://github.com/usnistgov/oscal-xproc3 - saving me many, many hours debugging.
I like that. I shall have to see about adding a flag to my implementation that supports doing that as part of the compile process.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/
> There is no safety in numbers, or in anything else.--James Thurber
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2024 16:38:17 UTC