- From: <denis.maier@unibe.ch>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 08:22:05 +0000
- To: <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <GV0P278MB0211522F0CB0938108083BE083E32@GV0P278MB0211.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Hi, As said in my earlier message, I'm currently learning xproc. As a journal manager I've implemented a single source publishing workflow using pandoc (word->markdown ; markdown -> jats xml), xslt (polishing the xml; xml->html) , and context (xml->pdf). Everything currently held together by a rather simplistic makefile. Now, I'm evaluating better options, and I'm wondering if and how I could use xproc for that or at least intergrate it into my workflow. I've already decided that a xproc pipeline will probably be better than my monoithic xslt cleanup script (which is getting bigger and less maintainable). But should it be possible to use xproc pipelines instead of a makefile? Can it easily call external tools? And would that be easier and more flexible than the makefile approach? I've also thought about using python scripts or maybe a go cli tool, but I'm wondering if xproc would be a better choice. Best, Denis
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2024 09:35:29 UTC