Re: “Final” editorial drafts published

Thanks to all of you, editors, implementors, book-writers, dishwasher-loaders, beer-contributors, and all various roles each of you may have had during this work.
We now have a specification, an implementation, and we are able to offer these new tools to people who need them.
I've not been very helpful, but I've learn a lot, and it was really a pleasure.

Thanks again,
Christophe

July 3, 2022 11:20:12 AM CEST Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:Hello folks,

At the meetup during XML Prague this year, the community group decided
to finalize and publish the 3.0 specifications (the core language
specification and the standard step library; the additional step
libraries aren’t final yet). We’ve had last call drafts out there for a
while and there have been no new, substantive issues in ages.

On Friday, I published a “final” editorial draft of the language
specification:

  https://spec.xproc.org/master/head/xproc/

This morning, I published a “final” editorial draft of the standard step
library:

  https://spec.xproc.org/master/head/steps/

After a short review period, I’ll take out the editorial note and we’ll
republish them as the final 3.0 specifications at some persistent URI.

Congratulations, everyone, we’re almost there!

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norman Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
https://nwalsh.com/

> If we could read the secret history of our enemies, we should find in
> each one's life sorrow and suffering enough to disarm all
> hostility.--H. W. Longfellow