- From: Matthieu RICAUD-DUSSARGET <m.ricaud-dussarget@lefebvre-sarrut.eu>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:13:59 +0000
- To: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Hi Achim, Thank you for your reply and wishes ! I wish you all the best for 2018, and to your family, friends and Morgana as well :) This "XVRL" format is not standard at all but there seems not to exist any generic one. Indeed this is actually just a good occasion to speak about this problematic next time we see us. See you in Prague! Cheers Matthieu -----Message d'origine----- De : Achim Berndzen [mailto:achim.berndzen@xml-project.com] Envoyé : mardi 2 janvier 2018 12:02 À : Matthieu RICAUD-DUSSARGET Cc : xproc-dev@w3.org Objet : Re: [xproc 3.0] proposal for a generic xml validation report language (#issue 135) HI Matthieu, first of all: Happy new year to you, your family and your colleagues. As you know I am not an expert in complicated validation processes, but as we all agreed, XProc 3.0 should support generating reports on all validation steps. So we are in need for a common or generic language and for me might be a good step in this direction. Although Ari has not set up an agenda for the Community Group Meeting in Prague on Feb. 6 & 7, this might be a good topic to discuss face to face, bringing together the different experience and requirements from different users. Greetings from Germany, Achim > Am 10.12.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Matthieu RICAUD-DUSSARGET <m.ricaud-dussarget@lefebvre-sarrut.eu>: > > Hi all, > > In my company we need an XML generic format to get errors and warning from a multiple validation (schema + schematron). > We’ve been looking at existing languages like SVRL, PSVI, XSV, saxon report language but none of them exactly matches our need. > At the beginning, we thought SVRL was the best candidate, but we found it’s actually too much tied with schematron validation only. > > So we finally create an internal grammar which we call XVRL (stands for “XML Validation Report Language”). > > We discussed in Amsterdam meetup about a unifying report ports of validation steps in xproc as describe here : https://github.com/xproc/1.0-specification/issues/135 and we thought XVRL could help in this direction ? > Please find as attach file a sample and the grammar (both Relax NG and XML Schema). > If you find this is an interesting candidate I guess we could add in on github with an open source licence. > > Any comments welcome about the format itself and about its use with xproc ? > > Best regards > Matthieu Ricaud. > > PS : do you think adding this proposal to issue #135 makes sens ? or > any where else (xml-dev list?) PPS : We also made an XVRL to JSON > conversion using the xpath 3.0 xml-to-json() function > > > Cordialement, > > <image001.png> > <image002.png> > Matthieu Ricaud-Dussarget > Expert XML > SI EDITORIAL > m.ricaud-dussarget@lefebvre-sarrut.eu > Tél : 01 40 92 21 98 > 80 Avenue de la Marne - 92120 Montrouge > > > <sample-report.xvrl><xvrl.rng><xvrl.xsd><xml.xsd><sample-report.xvrl.x > json><sample-report.xvrl.xjson.json> -------------------------------------- Achim Berndzen achim.berndzen@xml-project.com http://www.xml-project.com
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2018 09:14:32 UTC