- From: Achim Berndzen <achim.berndzen@xml-project.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:10:48 +0100
- To: j.pertermann@srz.de
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Hi Jan, thanks for your explanation, since I obviously missed your point. Achim ------------------------------------------------ Achim Berndzen achim.berndzen@xml-project.com <xml-project /> Achim Berndzen Kleine Breite 26a 38302 Wolfenbüttel, Germany http://www.xml-project.com > Am 26.02.2018 um 17:02 schrieb Jan Pertermann <j.pertermann@srz.de>: > > Hi Achim, > > when writing <p:somestep ... identity="true"> I don't want the step to exactly behave like a <p:identity>. A step with no primary output port will copy it's input to the output (as primary). If I need the common result of this step later in my script, I connect explicitly - here the @identity should play no role. In case of a step with a primary output port, it should work equally (even if the step has no primary input port). Do you think this is a consistent behaviour? Actually it is a short form for: > > --- > <p:otherstep name="o" /> > > <p:somestep /> > > (<p:sink />) > <p:identity> > <p:with-input port="source"> > <p:pipe step="o" port="result"/> > </p:with-input> > </p:identity> > --- > > Regards, > Jan
Received on Monday, 26 February 2018 17:11:17 UTC