- From: Kraetke, Martin, le-tex <martin.kraetke@le-tex.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:39:46 +0100
- To: David Levy <dml.public@sbcglobal.net>, xproc-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <569CB2E2.1060704@le-tex.de>
Hi, You can use p:serialization to control the serialization of certain output documents. With the option omit-xml-declaration, you can choose whether to keep or omit the XML declaration. The default is to produce no XML declaration. A simple example pipeline is attached. Kind regards, Martin -- Martin Kraetke Lead Content Engineer le-tex publishing services GmbH Weissenfelser Str. 84, 04229 Leipzig, Germany Phone +49 341 355356 143, Fax +49 341 355356 543 martin.kraetke@le-tex.de, http://www.le-tex.de Registergericht / Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Leipzig Registernummer / Registration Number: HRB 24930 Geschäftsführer: Gerrit Imsieke, Svea Jelonek, Thomas Schmidt, Dr. Reinhard Vöckler Am 11.01.2016 um 18:23 schrieb David Levy: > Hello, > > I have just begun experimenting with Xproc with reasonable success after a > first day. > > I did have one question and I hope I'm not embarrassing myself. When I > submit an XML document to p:validate-with-xml-schema, the output omits the > XML prolog: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > > causing some (easily-solved) issues in downstream processing. Or I can just > pass the input to p:validate-with-xml-schema to downstream steps and ignore > its output. > > But I wonder. Is this intended behavior? Is there an easy way to have > p:validate-with-xml-schema include the prolog in its output? > > With thanks, > > David Levy > > >
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: serialization.xpl
Received on Monday, 18 January 2016 09:40:24 UTC