Re: XML Calabash and logging

If Calabash is available for use as a library, I'd recommend coding against
SLF4J, not a specific logging impl.  Many projects I work on use SLF4J, and
when libraries code against that, the final product is free to chose
between logback or log4j or whatever as the logging impl.  I think of SLF4J
as a sort of unifying API for all sorts of disparate libraries to have
their log messages go through the same system (e.g. not having to manage
seperate logging.conf files for each). Not terribly familiar w/ log4j2,
though. And if this is just a command-line app and not a library, what does
it matter?


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

> Offline, David is encouraging me to just skip SLF4J and use
> LOG4J2. Anyone have reason to be opposed?
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> Lead Engineer
> MarkLogic Corporation
> Phone: +1 512 761 6676
> www.marklogic.com
>