- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:05:50 -0600
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2014 15:30:29 UTC
Conal Tuohy <conal.tuohy@gmail.com> writes: > I'd like to suggest that the next XProc could relax that requirement, > to allow the step to parse parameters with arbitrary names, including > ones which would not work as XProc parameters without some further > processing. If you could file this as an issue at github.com/xproc/specification and include a use case or some examples, that would be very helpful. We're redoing parameters as keys in a map so perhaps there's room for more flexibility. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2014 15:30:29 UTC