- From: Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:00:05 +0100
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1754E798-17F7-40EA-848F-CB04F966B771@gmail.com>
I agree with Florent, configuration of mock objects would be the responsibility of the test framework. I know that XProc itself can be used to describe tests, but imho we'd be better served with a dedicated syntax, à la XProc test suite or even better XSpec for XProc. An XProc-based implementation of XSpec-for-XProc could indeed use p:delete and p:insert with px:eval to modify the tested XProc at runtime. Romain. On 19 mars 2013, at 18:39, Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I guess it's ok for unit tests, but it would be cool if it were implementation-independent. > > Alternatively, with dynamic evaluation you could p:delete the p:import statements and p:insert new p:import statements. > > Jostein > > > On 19 March 2013 17:45, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> wrote: > Hi Jostein, > > An idea would be to use a URI resolver on your implementation (which > would make it implementation-dependent, but that is probably OK for > unit tests). Your URI resolver could be configured or driven by some > XML of course... > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://fgeorges.org/ > http://h2oconsulting.be/ > > > On 19 March 2013 16:23, Jostein Austvik Jacobsen wrote: > > So I've been fiddling with testing some XProc steps lately, and realized > > that there's no way (afaik) to create a "mock step" without editing either > > the step you want to test or the XML catalog. So it's not possible to do > > unit testing in XProc; only integration testing. > > > > I think it would be useful to be able to override a URI that is already > > defined in a XML catalog. Say I want to test the following step: > > > > <p:declare-step type="x:mystep" xml:base="file:/tmp/mystep.xpl" ...> > > <p:import href="http://www.example.com/mydependency.xpl"/> > > ... > > </p:declare-step> > > > > But I don't want x:mystep to invoke http://www.example.com/mydependency.xpl > > as it might produce non-deterministic side-effects. What if I could do > > something like this to override the XML catalog: > > > > <x:mystep> > > <p:resource name="http://www.example.com/mydependency.xpl" > > uri="mockdependency.xpl"/> > > </x:mystep> > > > > The Resource Manager page on the v.next wiki[1] isn't very detailed yet but > > maybe it will be possible to do something like this with the planned > > resource manager? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/XProc_Resource_Manager > > > > (another thing that would make XProc testing easier would be dynamic > > pipeline execution; p:evaluate/cx:eval) > > > > Jostein >
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 18:00:39 UTC