- From: alyx <alyxtmp-netbeans@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
Good morning, So i'm writing an XRX webapp; wanting to be as standardsy as reasonably practical i decide to look at XProc for my build system -- and promptly run face-first into the XD0001 bug^H^H^Herror upon trying to write HTML5. But before i wander over to see what Ant's been up to in the half-a-decade since i've looked at it, i was wondering if anyone would be willing to explain for a newbie the rationale behind that design decision. If my XSLT2 transform produces as its primary output some nice xml -- or, as in my case, a simple Result Code 0 Everything's Cool WOO HOO -- to feed to the next step in the pipeline if any, it's not immediately obvious to me why it's any of XProc's business if various xsl:result-document tags want to emit HTML5, or unparsed Dothraki, or pseudorandom gibberish. I understand that, according to XProc, "non-XML documents are considered out-of-scope", but this seems like a (unnecessarily?) severe restriction upon its usefulness. (If i've missed a solution more elegant than the p:exec hackery i've seen here, like if Calabash has a -chill flag or something, i'd also be happy to hear it.) TIA, --alex.
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 11:58:55 UTC