- From: Matthieu Ricaud-Dussarget <matthieu.ricaud@igs-cp.fr>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:28:27 +0200
- CC: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <503DD2AB.1000402@igs-cp.fr>
Thanks Yves and Andrew, I found the same explanation with xpath sequence comparaison in R. Castello XPATH-2 PPT : (item1, item2) op (item3, item4) is evaluated as: (item1 op item3) or (item1 op item4) or (item2 op item3) or (item2 op item4) (1, 2) = (2, 3) is evaluated as: (1 = 2) or (1 = 3) or *(2 =2)* or (2 = 3) this it returns true I unfortunately didn't have yet the time to look at support of "some" with saxon9he, I'm sure it works because I often use it but maybe there is some special case where it don't work... I'll have a closer look as soon as possible. Sorry if all this finally don't have directly to do with xproc... Regards, Matthieu Le 28/08/2012 13:16, Andrew Welch a écrit : > On 28 August 2012 12:10, Yves Forkl <Y.Forkl@srz.de> wrote: >> Am 27.08.2012 18:14, schrieb Matthieu Ricaud-Dussarget: >>> (Is a sequence equal to another if one of his item is the same ? But this is an XPath question, I'll have a look in the spec.) >> This very useful XPath 2.0 feature is called "general comparison", see >> http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-general-comparisons > some more information here: > > http://ajwelch.blogspot.co.uk/2007/08/when-b-and-b-both-return-true.html > > -- Matthieu Ricaud 05 45 37 08 90 IGS-CP, service livres numériques
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 08:29:01 UTC