Re: Totally non-conformant JSON hack

David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> writes:
> Not worried about niceness or elegance ... but am concerned about using a
> 'convention' that will have some lifetime.
> Have you considered JSONx which is (has been?) introduced to the public
> domain (after being patented by IBM) ?

Patented!? F*CK YOU, IBM.

> It would be nice if the community could narrow down rather then proliferate
> on if not a 'standard' atleast a 'common' way of translating JSON to XML in
> a lossless format.

Sure. I'm happy to switch to a different XML encoding if that's the
right thing to do.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 413 624 6676
www.marklogic.com