- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:29:49 -0500
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 12:30:29 UTC
Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl> writes: > Actually, I don't really understand why the parameters port is returning a > sequence at all. Can anyone give a use case for that? I was kinda > surprised it isn't normalized with a p:parameters under the hood by > default.. It's a sequence because you might bind several documents to it. You could have several parameter ports and be combining them all together for one step. The processor could be required to normalize them to a single c:parameter-set, I suppose, but we didn't write it that way. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 413 624 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 12:30:29 UTC