- From: Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:59:31 +0100
- To: David Lee <dlee@calldei.com>, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
The 'mailto' link sounds unrelated to me, is more of a browser thing IMHO. SMTP versus MAPI and others: from the perspective of implementation, yes difficult. But I don't think anyone would want to implement those from scratch anyway. ;-) Also, SMTP and MAPI are already spec'ed I'd expect, so you can reference those. And from the developer/user point of view: they would just need to specify a method, right? I don't see reason why they should pass message details differently because of this. WDYT? -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: David Lee [mailto:dlee@calldei.com] Verzonden: woensdag 16 november 2011 12:48 Aan: 'Geert Josten'; 'Florent Georges' CC: 'Norman Walsh'; 'XProc Dev' Onderwerp: RE: Sending e-mails from a pipeline... There's also the issue of what protocol and/or server/port to use ... I suspect were all assuming SMTP ... but there is MAPI and various other protocols. Or perhaps even a specific email *client* (ug) ... like what happens in a browser when you click on a mailto link ... How/where to configure these ? I do agree this would be a great feature (and its getting me thinking I should implement it in xmsh ...) but it is indeed non-trivial for both the spec *and* the implementation. ---------------------------------------- David A. Lee dlee@calldei.com http://www.xmlsh.org -----Original Message----- From: Geert Josten [mailto:geert.josten@dayon.nl] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:27 AM To: Florent Georges Cc: Norman Walsh; XProc Dev Subject: RE: Sending e-mails from a pipeline... Let me try to recap and rephrase, in attempt to make my point clearer.. I'd say ideally you would want a step to send mail, something like xx:send-mail. MIME encoding, packaging, adding attachments properly, and sending it over the wire in such a way that it is understood by the receiver, and all that could very well be complicated I agree. But should the one writing the xx:send-mail, or the one using it indirectly in some way, care about the technical fuss? Not sure I understood Norm correctly, it sounded a bit like using p:http-request to send the message. But that would indeed imply that the developer would have to dig deep into MIME to make it work, while I think there are plenty libraries available out there, that could do the hard work for you.. ;-) Stop glueing, start coding.. ;-) Grtz -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: fgeorges@gmail.com [mailto:fgeorges@gmail.com] Namens Florent Georges Verzonden: woensdag 16 november 2011 11:54 Aan: Geert Josten CC: Norman Walsh; XProc Dev Onderwerp: Re: Sending e-mails from a pipeline... On 16 November 2011 11:47, Geert Josten wrote: > But in terms of transmitting (sending) the message over the > wire, does it really matter? Maybe I oversimplify things in my > mind, but thinking of multipart http requests, those are quite > easy to generate. Note, I am only talking about sending, not > about receiving.. Well, you send an email only for someone to receive it, don't you? ;-) And you want him/her to get all the infos he/she needs to read that email. The MIME type is one of those. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 12:00:14 UTC