- From: Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:43:39 +0200
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
> in theory its possible, in actual practice I have not seen it Yes I know. I'm looking for real life use cases, out of curiosity :) Romain. Le 3 juin 11 à 17:24, James Fuller a écrit : > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The error document [1] appearing on the "error" input port of a >> p:catch is >> basically a c:errors element with c:error children. >> >> In all the use cases I've met so fat it typically contains only one >> c:error >> child. Are there existing use cases where it is contains either >> none or >> several children ? >> >> I'd like to re-throw an error using p:error in a p:catch sub- >> pipeline, and >> I'm trying to find the best approach when there are none/several >> c:error >> children... > > c:errors is defined as follows; > > <c:errors> > c:error* > </c:errors> > > so in theory its possible, in actual practice I have not seen it ... > it remains to be seen if there are scenarios such as nested > try/catches where multiple c:error children; maybe other impl have > discovered such situations ? > > Jim Fuller
Received on Friday, 3 June 2011 15:44:14 UTC