- From: <vojtech.toman@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:17:29 -0500
- To: <xproc-dev@w3.org>
> First it might be good to rename to call it template-018.xml instead
> (an svn rename should do the trick)
Sure, I wanted to wait with the svn rename until the latest note gets accepted. But since I have already updated the tests to use p:template, maybe I should have done the migration completely.
> Then I think it doesn't test exactly the use case Florent cited
>
> <p:input port="template">
> <p:inline>
> <!-- {$val} -->
> <?a {$val} -->
> <c:data>before { $val } after</c:data>
> <!-- {$val} -->
> <?a {$val} -->
> </p:inline>
> </p:input>
> That one, would do
Well, I just did a literal copy of Florent's pipeline. But I think you are right, your example covers more cases.
Vojtech
--
Vojtech Toman
Consultant Software Engineer
EMC | Information Intelligence Group
vojtech.toman@emc.com
http://developer.emc.com/xmltech
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:37:41 UTC