- From: Stefanie Haupt <st.haupt@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:00:15 +0100
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
Vojtech, right you are! I'm sorry for overlooking that! Both processors work like a charm when the p:exec step is written THAT way. I'll try to remember that whenever I run into strange problems to see if the problem persists when the code is written in its long form. Thank you again! Regards, Stefanie On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:44 PM, <vojtech.toman@emc.com> wrote: > Even if you use p:with-option? I don't believe that. "args" is just a step option like any other, and setting its value using XPath expressions should be possible: > > <p:exec> > <p:with-option name="args" select="concat(...)"/> > </p:exec> > > Regards, > Vojtech > > > -- > Vojtech Toman > Consultant Software Engineer > EMC | Information Intelligence Group > vojtech.toman@emc.com > http://developer.emc.com/xmltech > -- Stefanie Haupt, M.A.
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 15:00:49 UTC