- From: Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:14:07 +0100
- To: vojtech.toman@emc.com
- Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 13:14:59 UTC
Also, viewports are useful for other stuff than just modifying a document. For instance, what if you wanted to store all HTML elements as separate HTML files but ignore all TEXT elements? in this case p:modifySubtree and p:modifyNode wouldn't be meaningful. I look at p:viewport as a kind of advanced version of p:for-each. If it had to be renamed, then maybe p:for-each-match ? Anyway, I like "p:viewport" - both the step and it's name :) Regards p:viewport-fan 2011/2/2 <vojtech.toman@emc.com> > > Vojtech,, although I understand your points fully they > > speak to me that viewport is talking about something > > other than xml documents. > > Yes, the original viewport definition(s) may be unrelated to XML, but that > does not mean we cannot take existing concepts and apply them to XML, or to > any other area. > > Regards, > Viewport :) > > > -- > Vojtech Toman > Consultant Software Engineer > EMC | Information Intelligence Group > vojtech.toman@emc.com > http://developer.emc.com/xmltech > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 13:14:59 UTC