- From: Hans-Juergen Rennau <rennau@bits-ac.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:25:04 +0100
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Hi Alex, emphatically agreed - the word viewport has always been a mystery to me. Always will be. The only way out, for me, is learning it by heart. I think you are right in caring about names. After all - what the step does is simply updating the document, in a way which is simplified by identifying target fragments and "forgetting" the rest - restricted, local updates, so to speak. Therefore your proposals make sense to me. Regards, Hans-Juergen PS: Perhaps p:modifyNodes is better than p:modifyNode? Often it is a set of nodes what is edited. Or perhaps p:localUpdates? Alex wrote: ... btw is there a way to vote for changing the name of p:viewport I'm not certain if the graphics terminology influenced the naming or if that is coincidence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viewport What would a developer think p:viewport does intuitively? If random xml developer not familiar with xproc was asked what they were going to do when viewing a port on their xml input what would they say? There may be a better term related to what is happening with the xml input such that a selection of the document is being modified. p:modifySubtree p:modifyNode Maybe p:modifyNode is the most intuitive I can come up with brainstorming here.. Let me know your thoughts Regards
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 11:25:37 UTC